Why You Should Read Webfiction

Posted by JanOda on Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Webfiction is a great pastime due to two important aspects: it’s convenient, and it’s a very social way of reading. I’ll explain each aspect thoroughly below.

Webfiction is Convenient…

… because it’s everywhere.

The biggest caveat of webfiction is that it’s published online. Which, in this era, means you can access it from almost everywhere. Now that smartphones have arrived and laptops are becoming more affordable everyday, the internet is truly within everybody’s reach, no matter whether you are at work, in a bar or in a doctor’s waiting room.

But there’s more.  The most common format of webfiction is the serialized novel, which means you can get your short shot of fiction on a daily, weekly or monthly basis! Some stories have lenghty updates, others  short, so everyone can find a story one that fulfills his or her personal fiction needs.

If you’re not good at waiting for updates, and prefer to read a lot in one go, there are a lot of completed online novels available for free, too, and most serialized novels will have a lenghty backlog to keep you occupied.

If you’re a short story fan, the internet is really the place for you. Short stories are everywhere, ranging from the incredibly short ones hosted at six word stories and one-word, to the medium short stories called flash-fiction (which has it’s own independent movement called #FridayFlash), to the regular short stories offered online by countless authors, organizations, and hosts.

… because it’s free.

The best part of all this, however, is that I have been talking about free online fiction the whole time. You probably think that if it’s free it must be ridiculously bad, but that isn’t necessarily the case. We live in the era of free content, and more and more entertainment providers, including authors, are choosing a different kind of support method, called patronage. The old About Section on the Web Fiction Guide said it better than I could:

“Web comics are free, but some of them are better than what you’d get in a newspaper. Opinion blogs are free, but some are better than what you’d get in a magazine.
Quality and price seldom have much to do with each other, when it comes to creativity.”

Webfiction is Social…

… because the author is only a mouseclick away.

With the arrival of web 2.0 the internet is more about connecting than ever before. Reading webfiction is very social in a number of ways.

Have you ever wanted to contact your favorite author to share how the story made you feel? Have you ever wanted to know why your favorite character did something, but the author’s contact information wasn’t available? Webfiction is mostly designed for easy author-reader interaction. Fans can comment on chapters, email the author with questions that are driving them crazy, and give immediate feedback on the plot and their favorite characters.

Often it feels like the author is in your room, telling you a story, and answering any questions you might have. It’s a great experience!

… because you’re already part of the bookclub!

The best part is, you’re never alone in that room. Other people are following the same story as you, and if you feel the need for it you can instantly connect with other fans. With Webfiction you don’t have to search for fan-clubs or discussion boards. You can comment right on the published chapter or story, and get quick response from fellow readers. It’s like an instant book-club! And once you’ve connected with like-minded fans the true fun begins.

Tags: ,

  • Great reasons to read online, Jan. I've got one more.

    One hesitation I had before getting into writing online (shameless plug: www.chevenga.com) was that, supposedly, people don't like to read off a screen, especially people with vision difficulties.

    Then I learned (on www.weblit.us, in fact) that if you need bigger print, you just hit [control] + . This works with Internet Explorer and Firefox, at least.

    Try that with a dead-tree book!
  • The idea that people don't like to read off screens is an old wives tale. We read off screens all the time -- e-mails, blogs, word processor documents, forums, chat rooms.

    Up until recently, people didn't read stories on screens because people hadn't written stories FOR screens. Weblit is changing that.
  • I believe I even saw stated somewhere that people have never read as much as
    we do nowadays. The whole converting people thing is just about making it
    clear that it's okay to read fiction from a screen too.
  • I just wanted to add that I love the bookclub analogy, and it is one that I have tried to pass around in reference to online fiction, since it places both the book and the reader in the same space; however, I was also very impressed by the traction this summer of InfiniteSummer , where a large group of people collaborated in reading David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest during a fixed time period.

    I know one of the things MCM has mentioned is the possibility of rebooting an existing serial by rolling it back to chapter one, even though this is completely artificial, as the full ePub or PDF has already been released... however, it allows a group of people to read in lockstep, and that is really important when you are dealing with random access points and readers who may not be aware of the history behind a specific piece of writing. Any work of fiction is *fiction* - when a group of people come together to read in unison, it becomes literary.

    Discovery is important to readers (if you like this, you may also like this); but so is synchronicity (if you are reading this, so are these people).
  • I''m not quite sure I agree with your idea of literary, but that's probably due to the language difference. However I agree completey that reading together is one of the main web-fiction perks..
  • My background is in traditional literature, so to me, literature is a term which is often associated with canon - ie with Jane Austen, Herman Melville, Charles Dickens etc. But really, when you study literature, you are communing with the writing of people who have written about literature as much as the novels and poems themselves. What qualifies literature for me is specifically the process of reading together, a process which creates canons, is not created by canons.

    It is a somewhat political argument, but I think it is important to note that I really don't want to cut traditionally published writers out of the picture, because they are going to have a hard enough time when the traditional publishers start to fold.
  • I quite like your idea, I just don't think I'll ever think about it that way. The canon meaning is implemented in my brains too strong for that.

    This site is very much about fan experience, so if traditionally published authors organize interactive things for their fans, I'd probably go "Squeee" to. The problem is so much of them think so traditional, and I'm no good with that.
  • merrilee
    Great points Janoda :)
blog comments powered by Disqus